PayFac Vs. ISO: Key Differences & Roles In Payment Processing
The world of payment processing has its fair share of acronyms, and two of the most popular are PayFac (Payment Facilitator) and ISO (Independent Sales Organization). Though they both operate in the payment processing industry, they have distinct differences that can impact businesses in various ways. This blog post explores some of the key differences between PayFac vs. ISO providers so that you can make an informed decision about which payment processing option makes the most sense for your growing business.
What Is an Independent Sales Organization (ISO)?
An Independent Sales Organization is a third-party company that partners with payment processors to resell their services to merchants. ISOs act as intermediaries between the processor and the merchant, providing sales, support and sometimes even underwriting services. ISOs typically have established relationships with multiple processors, allowing them to offer a variety of payment processing solutions to their merchant clients.
To learn more, visit becoming an ISO for merchant services.
What Is a PayFac?
A Payment Facilitator is a company that streamlines the payment processing experience by providing a platform for merchants to accept and manage transactions. Instead of working with a payment processor directly, businesses can work with a PayFac, which handles the processing on their behalf. PayFacs are responsible for underwriting, risk management and transaction monitoring, allowing merchants to focus on their core business operations.
Differences Between a PayFac and an ISO
Since both ISOs and PayFacs facilitate payment processing, they’re often used interchangeably. Below are some key differences in how ISO vs. PayFac providers operate:
Contracts
One significant difference between PayFacs and ISOs lies in the contracts they offer to merchants. PayFacs typically provide short-term, flexible agreements with minimal setup fees, making them an attractive option for smaller businesses or those just starting. ISOs, on the other hand, often require merchants to sign longer-term contracts with more rigid terms, which can be beneficial for larger, more established businesses seeking stability.
Responsibilities
PayFacs and ISOs also differ in terms of responsibilities. PayFacs are responsible for underwriting, risk management and transaction monitoring for the merchants they serve. This means they handle the entire payment process, from customer authentication to settlement. ISOs, conversely, are primarily focused on sales and support, with the actual payment processing being handled by their partnered processors.
Risk Management
Risk management is another area where PayFacs and ISOs diverge. PayFacs are responsible for managing the risks associated with processing payments, including fraud prevention and chargeback disputes. ISOs, on the other hand, rely on their partnered processors for risk management and may provide additional support to their merchants as needed.
Processor Relationships
The relationship with payment processors also sets PayFacs and ISOs apart. ISOs work with multiple processors, giving them the flexibility to offer a variety of payment solutions to merchants. By contrast, PayFacs usually have a single processing partner or may even be the processor themselves. This can lead to a more streamlined experience for merchants, but it can also limit the number of available options and features.
Technology
When it comes to technology, PayFacs generally provide a seamless, integrated payment platform that merchants can use to manage their transactions. This can simplify the payment process and make it easier for merchants to keep track of their sales. ISOs, while they may offer some in-house solutions, usually rely on the technology provided by their partnered processors.
Funding and Payments Distribution
Funding and payments distribution is another area where PayFacs and ISOs differ. PayFacs handle the entire payment process, from authorization to settlement, and usually offer faster funding times for merchants. ISOs, on the other hand, rely on their partnered processors to handle the actual payment processing and may have longer settlement times as a result.
Summing Up
When it comes to choosing between a PayFac and an ISO, the best option depends on your business's specific needs and preferences. PayFacs are generally more suitable for smaller businesses or those looking for a streamlined, integrated payment platform with faster funding times. ISOs may be a better fit for larger, more established businesses that prefer long-term contracts and a wider range of payment processing solutions.
By understanding the differences between PayFacs and ISOs, you can make an informed decision that best aligns with your business's payment processing requirements. As you evaluate your options, consider the key factors above to ensure you choose the right payment processing partner for your business.
For a detailed overview of CardConnect's offerings, take a look at our comprehensive ISO agent program opportunities - or click here for a free consultation.